Deciding whether to build software in-house or buy it from third-party vendors is one of the hardest decisions engineering leadership must make. This involves evaluating the capabilities of internal teams versus the options available in the market, making it a strategic decision-making process that must be carried out for every supporting feature and technology in the engineering workflow.
That’s because almost any software product or feature you can dream of is available as a service in today’s cloud-native technology environment. Vendors spend a great deal of time and money on marketing campaigns designed to tell you their product is worth it.
Sometimes it is. There are also cases when developing in-house capabilities is the better choice, and great leaders distinguish themselves by differentiating between the two.
Making the right decision every time isn’t easy, but it’s vital for guaranteeing long-term engineering efficiency. This is especially true for resource-constrained organizations that can’t afford to make mistakes.
The build vs. buy decision is a pivotal choice that businesses face when it comes to software solutions. This decision involves weighing the pros and cons of developing custom software in-house versus purchasing off-the-shelf software. Building custom software allows for a tailored solution that meets specific business requirements, offering a unique competitive advantage. However, it demands significant investment in terms of time, resources, and expertise, having a lot of hidden costs.
On the other hand, buying off-the-shelf software can be a quicker and more cost-effective route. These ready-made solutions are designed to address common business needs and can be deployed rapidly.
When making this decision, it’s crucial to consider the long-term impact on your company’s operations, finances, and competitiveness. Factors such as the alignment with strategic goals, the ability to scale, and the potential for future customization should all be part of the evaluation process.
Deciding whether to build software functionalities in-house or outsource them to a vendor is not just an operational decision. It represents the organization’s high-level strategy and can have far-reaching consequences.
Evaluating internal expertise and resources is crucial in this decision-making process. Partnering with a software company can address skill gaps and save resources, positioning the decision within the broader context of a company’s business strategy and operational efficiency.
This makes it a strategic decision, like expanding to a new market or restructuring the organization. As with other high-impact strategic decisions, the specifics are important. It’s not simply a matter of always building or always buying—you will have to examine each opportunity on a case-by-case basis.
This means asking some tough questions about your in-house capabilities:
You also need to understand the capabilities that external partners can offer. In-depth vendor evaluation and selection are important, even if you believe that building your own solution will probably be the best path. Without comprehensive information on what vendors offer, you won’t be able to make an accurate comparison.
You’ll have to make this decision for many different steps in the engineering process. In many cases, greatest benefits come from building your core functionalities in-house and buying supporting technologies from external partners.
For example, if your engineering team’s greatest strength is a technical skill like object-oriented design or cloud infrastructure provisioning, building your own support technology for measuring engineering performance may not make sense. Instead of drawing valuable employee hours away from your core proficiency, you might consider deploying a ready-made software engineering intelligence platform like Waydev.
When evaluating the build vs. buy decision, a thorough assessment of your company’s technical requirements and resources is essential. Start by analyzing the complexity of the software solution you need. Complex solutions may require specialized skills and a deep understanding of your business processes, which can make building in-house more challenging.
Consider the expertise and capacity of your development team. Do they have the necessary skills and experience to build the software solution you need? Additionally, evaluate the availability of resources such as time, budget, and infrastructure. Building custom software can be resource-intensive, and it’s important to ensure that your organization can support the project without compromising other critical initiatives.
Scalability and flexibility are also key considerations. The software solution should be able to grow with your business and adapt to changing needs. Compatibility with your existing systems and infrastructure is another critical factor. An ideal solution should integrate seamlessly with your current technology stack, minimizing disruptions and ensuring smooth operations.
Building software in-house allows you to create customized software solutions tailored to specific business needs, carefully matching project outcomes to your requirements. However, it can also significantly drain limited in-house resources. This is especially true of projects that aren’t a core value for the organization but still require significant input from developers.
Dragging developers away from value-generating workflows comes with risks. Employee satisfaction is highest when team members are assigned to tasks that match their competencies. Performance and efficiency can suffer when limited resources are spent on in-house projects outside the organization’s core values.
Your organization does not have an unlimited supply of engineering talent. Projects that require hard-to-find specialist talent may have additional opportunity costs. Security is a common example because most organizations can’t afford to take security team members away from their daily responsibilities.
These problems can draw engineering talent away from your core value-generating processes. The less time you spend on those core processes, the less efficient your team becomes overall. An engineering team that builds its own in-house solutions may spread itself too thin, and risk not achieving its most important strategic goals.
No modern technology product generates value in a vacuum. Your organization’s core value relies on a large number of supporting technologies. Vertically integrating all support needs into the main organization only makes sense for the largest enterprises on the planet — and even then, it doesn’t always work out.
Great engineering leadership means knowing the difference between vertical integration and reinventing the wheel.
When it comes to software products and features outside your organization’s core competencies, buying external solutions often provides the greatest value. It can dramatically reduce inefficiency by freeing up your internal team to spend more time on the high-impact strategic tasks it knows best. Practical considerations such as the decision to buy software versus building it in-house involve evaluating vendor support, integration capabilities, and the overall cost-benefit analysis.
Here are some of the main benefits your organization can leverage by deploying supporting technologies from reputable third-party partners:
In this scenario, context is key to successful strategic decision-making. The better you know your organization’s core value proposition, the easier it is to choose between building and buying technology products and capabilities. That’s why so many organizations partner with managed service providers for things as varied as security, infrastructure support, data analysis, and more.
The software industry is constantly changing, and engineering leaders are responsible for overseeing the technical side of operations and making decisions that align engineering initiatives with broader organizational strategies. As the complexity of managing engineering teams and processes increases, the need for clear, data-driven insights has never been more crucial. This is where Software Engineering Intelligence (SEI) comes into play.
Software Engineering Intelligence Platforms are tools that leverage advanced analytics and AI to provide deep insights into engineering workflows, team performance, and project delivery. By aggregating data from multiple sources—such as version control systems, issue trackers, and CI/CD pipelines—SEI platforms give engineering leaders a real-time view of team health, bottlenecks, and resource allocation. With these insights, leaders can make smarter decisions about whether to build in-house solutions or buy external technologies.
When it comes to implementing SEI, the decision to build vs buy is particularly impactful. Building an in-house SEI platform requires significant engineering expertise and ongoing maintenance and updates, which can divert focus from critical product development. The benefits of building might seem appealing, as custom software could address the organization’s exact needs. However, the time, resources, and talent required to create a robust, scalable system that offers accurate data can often drain limited engineering resources and have many hidden costs.
This is where the option of buying becomes extremely valuable. Vendors offering Software Engineering Intelligence platforms have already invested heavily in research and development, ensuring their solutions are cutting-edge, constantly updated, and backed by a team of experts. The advantage buying software like this is immediate access to powerful, off-the-shelf solutions that integrate seamlessly into existing workflows. Furthermore, the use of external SEI platforms allows teams to bypass the complexities of building custom software and maintaining it, giving engineering leadership the time and energy to focus on strategic goals.
Waydev stands as a prime example of how purchasing a Software Engineering Intelligence platform can benefit engineering teams. With Waydev, engineering leaders can gain visibility into their team’s performance, track key metrics like DORA and the SPACE framework, and measure essential KPIs such as Cycle Time with accuracy. The platform’s ready-made integrations with your existing tools ensure a smooth transition, allowing teams to start optimizing their processes immediately.
By opting for Waydev, organizations avoid the resource drain of building a custom SEI solution in-house. Instead, they unlock the power of data-driven insights, enabling smarter decision-making, faster development cycles, and ultimately, greater engineering efficiency. Waydev helps engineering leaders align their team’s efforts with broader organizational goals, facilitating high-impact work without the burden of managing complex data systems internally.
In conclusion, whether you’re weighing the decision to build vs buy in the context of SEI, the key is to recognize where external solutions, like Waydev, can provide the most value. Buying software and investing in the right third-party platform allows engineering leaders to focus on their core competencies and strategic objectives, driving long-term efficiency and success.
Your choice to build or buy can influence the strategic value of the entire organization. It directly impacts its ability to produce valuable software solutions while directly influencing the core values those solutions represent.
Waydev enables software engineering leaders to optimize their team’s performance, granting visibility into how engineering resources are allocated without relying on time-intensive manual processes. Discover how Waydev can help you accelerate development processes, implement DORA metrics, & SPACE Framework, & accurately measure Cycle Time.
Ready to improve your SDLC performance?
