Evidence links
Source before summary
Provide a clear connection from each statement to relevant Git, issue and delivery events, within permissions.
Interactive concept · Fictional example data · No live customer connection
01 / BRAIN EVIDENCE EXPLORER
Ask what changed.
See what supports the answer.
A concept for turning Waydev Brain into an evidence-led experience: question, response, supporting engineering signals, uncertainty and suggested next investigation. Nothing here queries a live tenant.
Interactive concept
Follow the evidence, not just the answer.
Select a sample engineering question. The panel shows a prewritten illustrative scenario with drill-down examples. It is not connected to real repositories or model inference.
Step 1 · Ask
Pick a question
Illustrative dataset. Metrics, project names and evidence IDs are fictional, provided to demonstrate the planned UX. They are not Waydev customer outcomes.
Recommended workflow
1. Select a question. 2. Read the answer. 3. Examine sources. 4. Review uncertainty. 5. Choose an investigation.
Step 2 · ExplainDemo engineering workspace · 30-day sample
Review response time is rising in the sample Backend team
Illustrative signal: sample PRs waited longer for first review. A queue of large cross-team changes may explain the trend, but the sample cannot establish a definitive cause.
First-review wait18h → 27h
Sample only
PRs in queue8 → 13
Sample only
Evidence coveragePartial
Illustrative completeness
Step 3 · Inspect evidence
Sample PR #1842 · First review after 29h
Fictional repository review event
Sample ISSUE-219 · Cross-team dependency
Fictional work-item reference
Sample CI-408 · No deployment correlation yet
Fictional pipeline signal
Uncertainty and limits
Hypothesis only. Coverage may exclude off-platform reviews or discussions. Confirm using approved source-system records.
Step 4 · Next investigation
Compare review queues by team and PR size; inspect selected PRs with an engineering lead.
Confidence
Show what is missing
Separate computed facts from hypotheses. State missing data, time boundaries and unresolved cross-system joins.
Actionability
Guide a useful next step
Recommend a targeted review, not automatic intervention or individual developer scoring.
Product boundary: this page proposes an experience. Evidence citations, confidence calculations and source-level drill-down require product validation and must not be described as implemented unless verified.
See the answer. Verify the signal.
Bring a real engineering question and inspect which connected sources Waydev can support in your environment.
