What did that feature cost in AI?
Attribute AI spend to the initiatives, epics and PRs your teams deliver. Waydev extends Project Costs and Cost Capitalization with the AI line item finance has been missing.
| Initiative | AI spend | AI assisted | PRs | Delivery cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Checkout revamp | $14.2K | 62% | 58 | down |
| Payments refactor | $11.8K | 41% | 36 | on budget |
| Mobile onboarding | $9.6K | 34% | 22 | watch |
Finance capitalizes features. AI spend is still a single overhead line.
No line of sight
AI cost is booked as tooling overhead, so nobody knows which roadmap items consumed it.
Capitalization gets harder
Auditors ask how AI assisted work was classified. Manual time sheets cannot answer.
Roadmap tradeoffs are blind
Product leaders cannot compare the AI cost of two initiatives before committing to one.
AI cost, mapped to the work it powered.
Live in your stack, not another spreadsheet.
Connect your stack
Link Git (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps), Jira, CI/CD and your AI coding tools with read-only access.
Waydev maps the work
Every PR, review, ticket and AI session is tied to a team, an initiative and the tool or agent that produced it.
Act on Signals
Waydev Agent flags what changed, suggests Goals, and answers follow up questions in plain language.
Waydev reads engineering metadata through read-only APIs. Source code content is never ingested. Visit the Trust Center
Questions engineering leaders ask
How is spend attributed to a feature?
Does this replace Cost Capitalization?
What if work is not linked to tickets?
Trusted by FORTUNE 500 enterprise companies
READY TO ADOPT A DEVELOPER PRODUCTIVITY INSIGHT PLATFORM?
