Back To All

Announcing The WAY Framework

August 6th, 2026
Topics
DORA
DX
SPACE
THE WAY FRAMEWORK
Share Article

Today we are announcing “THE WAY FRAMEWORK”

Cortex published DRIVE. LinearB published APEX. Uplevel published WAVE. Each one comes with a guide, a maturity assessment, and a platform that happens to be the only one built to run it.

Today we are announcing ours. Sort of.

It is called The WAY Framework, and it is built on one decision that makes it different from everything else on that list: it owns nothing. No proprietary metrics. No composite index. No acronym-shaped pillars competing with the research. To explain why we built it this way, I have to tell you how we got here, because we watched the whole story happen.

Informed by data

Twelve years of engineering measurement, in one timeline

2014 · DORA

The DevOps Research and Assessment program turns engineering measurement into a science. Four keys, tens of thousands of survey responses, and the landmark finding: speed and stability are not a trade-off. Elite teams get both from the same capabilities.

2017 · WAYDEV SHIPS

We launch one of the first Git analytics platforms in the world, built on the conviction that the truth about engineering lives in the work itself: commits, pull requests, reviews. We later patent the approach with the USPTO. Most of today’s vendors do not exist yet.

2021 · SPACE

The field’s course correction. The four keys were being abused as individual scorecards, so many of the same researchers publish SPACE: productivity is multidimensional, mix system data with perceptual data, and never let one metric stand alone, because any measure that becomes a target stops being a good measure.

2024 · DX CORE 4

DX compresses a decade of research into four dimensions with one headline metric each, developed with names from the DORA and SPACE lineage. It travels fast. Leaders adopt the vocabulary. There is one catch buried inside: the Effectiveness centerpiece, the DXI, is proprietary.

2025 · THE BILLION-DOLLAR SIGNAL

Atlassian acquires DX for one billion dollars. The market draws one conclusion: the framework is the moat. Own the language leaders think in, and you own the shortlist.

2026 · THE ACRONYM ARMS RACE

Within months, everyone has one. Cortex ships DRIVE with a book and a conference. LinearB ships APEX with an operating cadence. Uplevel ships WAVE with a diagnostic. Each is thoughtful. Each also maps, pillar by pillar, onto its author’s product.

2026 · THE WAY FRAMEWORK

We take the opposite position. Combine the best of the research under one roof, keep it current as the science evolves, and never lock your organization’s vocabulary to our product.

The pattern nobody says out loud

Every vendor framework is a mirror of its vendor

Cortex sells a service catalog, and DRIVE is a governance framework whose metrics need a catalog. LinearB sells PR instrumentation, and APEX is a PR-centric flow framework. Uplevel sells calendar-and-survey insight, and WAVE requires exactly that instrumentation. DX sold a survey platform, and Core 4’s centerpiece is a proprietary survey index.

None of these frameworks is dishonest. Smart people built them, and each contains ideas worth stealing: DRIVE’s operational review ritual, APEX’s PR-level AI attribution, WAVE’s warning that AI inflates activity metrics while delivered value stays flat. Steal all of it. It is free.

What is not free is adopting a vendor’s framework as your company’s official definition of engineering performance. Your targets, your board narrative, and your managers’ vocabulary get expressed in terms only one platform natively speaks. Data lock-in is a project. Vocabulary lock-in is a culture change.

“A framework you cannot take with you when you leave the vendor was never a framework. It was an onboarding flow.”

What WAY actually is

Three commitments: Work-first, Agnostic, Yours

WAY is a meta-framework: a set of commitments about how measurement should be built, distilled from nine years of doing this. It is the only framework in this market you could, in principle, implement without us. We simply intend to be the best place to run it.

W

Work-first

Every framework in this market is a projection of the same underlying reality: commits, pull requests, reviews, deployments, and the spend around them. We measure at the source, continuously, at the commit and PR level. Not calendars. Not self-reported time savings. Not catalog metadata. Get the source right and every projection becomes available.

A

Agnostic

WAY combines the best of the field instead of replacing it. Waydev implements DORA and DORA Core with benchmarks, SPACE-consistent views, Core 4-style balanced scorecards, and a full AI measurement layer: adoption, impact, and ROI per tool, per team, down to the spend. The ideas were never the lock-in. The instrumentation was.

Y

Yours

Your metric definitions stay industry-standard and portable. Your history rebuilds directly from your Git provider, so even changing platforms costs no baselines. Your framework choice stays reversible. Your organization’s language for engineering performance belongs to your organization.

What this means for you

In practice, starting today

If your board thinks in DORA or Core 4

Waydev speaks it natively, with industry benchmarks, grounded in commit-level telemetry instead of survey estimates. Your board deck fills itself, in the vocabulary your executives already know, and stays legible if you ever change platforms.

If your board is asking the AI ROI question

This is the question no framework fully answers, and the one we rebuilt Waydev around. Adoption, impact, and ROI per tool, per team, down to every token spent, measured in the delivery path where AI-assisted work actually behaves, not in self-reported time savings that are systematically optimistic.

If you read DRIVE, APEX, or WAVE and liked parts of them

Good. So did we. Run DRIVE’s operational review ritual on Waydev’s data. Apply APEX’s constraint analysis to our cycle time decomposition. Heed WAVE’s activity-inflation warning with our delivery outcomes. The ideas cost nothing. Only the instrumentation was ever for sale.

If you are worried about picking wrong

You cannot. That is the point. Under WAY, the framework is a lens, not a marriage. Start with DORA this quarter, add Core 4 views next quarter, adopt whatever the field validates next year. You change the lens, not the platform, and not the culture.

The short version

One question separates WAY from every other framework

Framework Can you take it with you when you leave the vendor?
DORA / SPACE / DORA Core Yes. Public research, no vendor owns it.
DX Core 4 Mostly. The DXI centerpiece is proprietary, and now Atlassian’s.
DRIVE / APEX / WAVE The ideas, yes. The measurement requires the author’s platform.
WAY Yes, by definition. WAY owns no metrics. That is the whole design.

The full guide covers all eight frameworks in depth, with links to every original source and a five-question rubric you can apply to any of them, including ours. Read The WAY Framework »

The warranty

Why we can promise this and the others cannot

The research will keep moving. DORA reinvented itself around AI. SPACE corrected the field. Core 4 compressed a decade into four numbers. Something will follow. And when it does, every vendor-framework company faces a conflict: absorbing the new science means admitting their acronym was not the answer. WAY has no such conflict, because WAY owns no answer.

Our standing guarantee, backed by nine years of doing exactly this: whatever the field’s best validated thinking is, Waydev will implement it, benchmark it, and hand it to you in your own vocabulary. When the science evolves, your platform evolves with it. You re-platform nothing.

And the structure backs the promise. Waydev is bootstrapped and profitable, with Fortune 500 customers including American Express, Dropbox, Caterpillar, and PwC. Nobody’s venture math forces us to manufacture a moat out of your vocabulary. In a year when a billion-dollar acquisition taught this market to weaponize frameworks, that independence is not a footnote. It is the warranty.

Questions we expect

Three honest answers up front

Isn’t announcing a framework while criticizing frameworks hypocritical?

We see the irony, and we designed WAY specifically to survive it. Every other framework in this market defines metrics its author sells. WAY defines commitments: measure at the source, combine the portable research, keep the vocabulary yours. It is the only framework here you could implement without us. Judge it by the same five-question rubric in the guide. We do.

We already standardized on Core 4 or DORA. Does WAY replace that?

No, it runs it. WAY is the layer underneath: Waydev implements DORA, DORA Core, SPACE-consistent views, and Core 4-style scorecards natively, on commit-level data with benchmarks. Keep your framework. What changes is that it stops depending on any single vendor’s instrumentation, including ours.

What do we actually get on day one?

Connect your Git provider and Waydev processes your full commit and PR history automatically. Within days you see your organization through DORA, SPACE, Core 4, and a complete AI ROI lens, adoption, impact, and return per tool and per team, on the same data. Your baselines rebuild from source, so there is no cold start.

Ready to measure the WAY?

Measure the work. Combine the best. Keep it yours.

Read the full field guide to every framework in this market, or skip the reading and see all of them on your own data, in days.

Read The WAY Framework
or
Request a Demo

Alex Circei is the CEO and Co-Founder of Waydev, the AI engineering intelligence platform trusted by Fortune 500 companies. Waydev has been building Git-first engineering analytics since 2017 and holds a USPTO patent in Git analytics.

Ready to unlock your SDLC productivity?

Request a Demo Call